Melbourne's Oldest Home found in Williamston

I just stumbled across this interesting article on theage.com.au and thought to share. It's believed it could be one of Melbourne oldest home, and it might be knocked down.

"A RAMSHACKLE mess in Williamstown is the centre of a bitter conservation row because it is thought to date from 1842, making it possibly Melbourne's oldest house. It is also on a prime development site and has an owner who needs to sell to prop up his dwindling superannuation."

Read more here:
http://www.theage.com.au/national/our-oldest-house-demolishers-delight-20090422-afdl.html

What do you guys think? Knock it down or keep it for future generations?

AJ
The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Homely.com.au.
Report
3
people following this discussion

5 Comments

Looks too badly decayed to be worth saving!

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Homely.com.au.
Report

I'm all for keeping history within Williamstown alive, after all it was the first settlement. I have to admit though that the place looks on it's last leg. A strong wind seems as though it could put it down. That said, I know nothing about restoration, nor hertage styled buildings.

If someone thinks they can get the restore done, then I think it should be restored to it's previous glory. History is something that can never be rebuilt or brought back. Once it is gone, it is gone. The UK in fact are having the same trouble with it's castles. Many are wasting away in a paddock or a large plot of land.

One would ask why would someone let a significant part of Williamstown History waste away like this? Seems convenient that it surfaces when there is money at stake.

2 bobs

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Homely.com.au.
Report

Heritage is generally good, but in this case I can't see how it could be 'restored'. It would be a 'replica' not the original as there is very little of the original left!

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Homely.com.au.
Report

Even though I can see your point, I have seen numerous cases where there is more of the original structure that one can see from a photo. In many cases material that has fallen to ground can be used as well as much of the original building material new and used. Perhaps the structure wont look 100% authentic once it is rebuilt, but the structure and its surroundings will be there for, hopefully, many more years to come. It is the history that we are trying to save, rather than the 100% original dwelling.

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Homely.com.au.
Report

That's a good point fallout. The history is more important the structure itself, and restoring\recreating the structure is a good reminder of times past.

AJ

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Homely.com.au.
Report

Rentals in Williamstown, VIC 3016